South African political parties are divided on how to handle escalating diplomatic tensions with the United States, with some advocating for a radical stance while others urge a diplomatic resolution.
The rift follows Washington’s decision to expel South Africa’s ambassador, Ebrahim Rasool, a move that has drawn mixed reactions from local political leaders.
The Pan African Congress (PAC) – an ally of the African National Congress – has called for a strong response.
PAC secretary general Apa Pooe condemned what he described as US interference in South African affairs.
“This is an attack on our sovereignty and an attempt to dictate our policies,” Pooe said in an interview with the South African Broadcasting Corporation.
He further insisted that South Africa must resist “all forms of diplomatic coercion” and remain steadfast in its domestic policies, including land reform.
“The land was stolen from African people through colonial apartheid and its return is a must. We must not be intimidated into abandoning justice.”
In contrast, the Democratic Alliance (DA) called for a diplomatic approach.
DA spokesperson for international relations Emma Powell described the tensions as “deeply unfortunate” and called on the presidency to expedite a ministerial delegation to Washington to mend relations.
“We call on the presidency to expedite the Government of National Unity’s formal delegation to Washington DC to negotiate a pathway towards the stabilisation of diplomatic relations with one of South Africa’s largest and most important trade and investment partners,” she told the public broadcaster.
Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) leader Corne Mulder advocated for a similar stance, arguing that Washington’s decision was a clear indication that the US no longer wished to engage with Rasool.
He said South Africa should “understand the seriousness of this reality and take the necessary steps to normalise international relations with the United States as soon as possible.”
JN/APA